Please enter the search related information in the fields below. Partial information works, e.g. "SP-21" in the "tdoc" field lists all TSG SA documents from 2021. Regular expressions mostly work in all fields (e.g. "2[34].501" in the "Spec" field lists all documents related to 23.501 and 24.501. Capitalization is disregarded, i.e. "3GPP" gives the same results as "3gpp".
Download results in JSON format
| tdoc | Title | Type / Revs | Source | Spec / CR | S/WID | Release | Meeting | Status | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4-2520146 | Discussion on RRM performance requirements for SBFD | discussion | CATT | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520205 | Draft CR on test cases of L1-CLI-RSSI measurement in FR1/FR2 |
draftCR revised to R4-2522802 |
Samsung | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520398 | Draft CR for TC17-18 L1-RSRP accuracy for SBFD |
draftCR revised to R4-2522803 |
vivo | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520461 | Discussion on RRM performance requirements for SBFD | discussion | CMCC | NR_duplex_evo-Perf |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | ||
| R4-2520462 | DraftCR on TC for collision between CSI-RS based RLM and UL (TC11-12) |
draftCR revised to R4-2522804 |
CMCC | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520548 | DraftCR Test case for L1-SRS-RSRP measurement accuracy in FR1 and FR2 in SBFD operation |
draftCR revised to R4-2522805 |
CATT | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520716 | Draft CR for CSI-RS based BFR and LR Test for FR1 and FR2 in SBFD |
draftCR revised to R4-2522806 |
LG Electronics Inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520802 | Discussion on RRM performance requirements for RRM impacts for SBFD operation | discussion | China Telecom | NR_duplex_evo-Perf |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | ||
| R4-2520811 | RRM performance requirements for CLI and SBFD operation | discussion | Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2520812 | draftCR on L1 CLI performance requirements |
draftCR revised to R4-2522807 |
Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521327 | On accuracy of CSI-RS based L1 measurement for SBFD operation | other | OPPO | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521334 | DraftCR on relaxed accuracy requirements for CSI-RS based L1-RSRP and L1-SINR | draftCR | OPPO | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
postponed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521635 | Discussion on performance requirements for SBFD | discussion | Huawei, HiSilicon | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521636 | draftCR on TC7-8 (L1-CLI-RSSI accuracy) for SBFD |
draftCR revised to R4-2522809 |
Huawei, HiSilicon | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521637 | Simulation results for L1-RSRP and L1-SINR accuracy | discussion | Huawei, HiSilicon | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521864 | draft CR on SBFD test case for FR2 CSI-RS based L1-RSRP measurement |
draftCR revised to R4-2522810 |
Ericsson | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521865 | draft CR on SBFD test case for FR1 CSI-RS based L1-RSRP measurement |
draftCR revised to R4-2522811 |
Ericsson | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521866 | Discussion on Perfomance requirements for SBFD operations | discussion | Ericsson | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521867 | Simulation results on CSI-RS based L1-RSRP for SBFD operation | other | Ericsson | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2521960 | Draft CR on test configuration for SBFD |
draftCR revised to R4-2522812 |
ZTE Corporation, Sanechips | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
revised | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522026 | Discussion on RRM performance requirements of Rel-19 SBFD | discussion | Samsung | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522065 | Discussion on performance requirements for SBFD | discussion | MediaTek inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522066 | CR on RLM OOS Test for FR1 PCell configured with CSI-RS-based RLM in SBFD | draftCR | MediaTek inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
not pursued | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522067 | CR on RLM OOS Test for FR2 PCell configured with CSI-RS-based RLM in SBFD | draftCR | MediaTek inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
not pursued | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522201 | RRM performance requirements for L1 CLI measurements | discussion | Qualcomm Incorporated | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
noted | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522202 | Test-cases on L1-SRS-RSRP measurement in FR1/FR2 | draftCR | Qualcomm Incorporated | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
withdrawn | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522802 | Draft CR on test cases of L1-CLI-RSSI measurement in FR1/FR2 |
draftCR revision of R4-2520205 |
Samsung | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522803 | Draft CR for TC17-18 L1-RSRP accuracy for SBFD |
draftCR revision of R4-2520398 |
vivo | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522804 | DraftCR on TC for collision between CSI-RS based RLM and UL (TC11-12) |
draftCR revision of R4-2520462 |
CMCC | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522805 | DraftCR Test case for L1-SRS-RSRP measurement accuracy in FR1 and FR2 in SBFD operation |
draftCR revision of R4-2520548 |
CATT | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522806 | Draft CR for CSI-RS based BFR and LR Test for FR1 and FR2 in SBFD |
draftCR revision of R4-2520716 |
LG Electronics Inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522807 | draftCR on L1 CLI performance requirements |
draftCR revision of R4-2520812 |
Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522808 | DraftCR on relaxed accuracy requirements for CSI-RS based L1-RSRP and L1-SINR | draftCR | OPPO | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
withdrawn | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522809 | draftCR on TC7-8 (L1-CLI-RSSI accuracy) for SBFD |
draftCR revision of R4-2521636 |
Huawei, HiSilicon | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522810 | draft CR on SBFD test case for FR2 CSI-RS based L1-RSRP measurement |
draftCR revision of R4-2521864 |
Ericsson | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522811 | draft CR on SBFD test case for FR1 CSI-RS based L1-RSRP measurement |
draftCR revision of R4-2521865 |
Ericsson | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522812 | Draft CR on test configuration for SBFD |
draftCR revision of R4-2521960 |
ZTE Corporation, Sanechips | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522813 | CR on RLM OOS Test for FR1 PCell configured with CSI-RS-based RLM in SBFD | draftCR | MediaTek inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
withdrawn | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522814 | CR on RLM OOS Test for FR2 PCell configured with CSI-RS-based RLM in SBFD | draftCR | MediaTek inc. | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
withdrawn | [WTS] [JSN] | |
| R4-2522845 | Big draftCR for SBFD RRM performance requirements | draftCR | Huawei, HiSilicon, Qualcomm | NR_duplex_evo-Perf | Rel-19 |
R4-117 AI: 6.13.3 |
endorsed | [WTS] [JSN] |
40 documents (0.39729785919189 seconds)