[{"name":"R5-202458","title":"On the MU of FR2 OBW","source":"ROHDE & SCHWARZ","contact":"Edwin Menzel","contact-id":65839,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Endorsement","abstract":"The measurement uncertainty (MU) of occupied bandwidth (OBW) has been discussed during the last meetings [1] to [12]. However, no final conclusion has been reached due to the dependence of OBW on the UE ACLR. At RAN5#85, measured data has been provided to be used as basis for the OBW MU analysis [9]. This contribution is an updated version of the paper submitted to RAN5#86-e [10] with respect to interpolation of the measurement data and the calculation of OBW.\nIn summary, the SNR impact on the MU for ACLR has been analyzed. \nObservation 1: By applying a span to CHBW ratio of 1.5 instead of 2.0 the impact of the SNR on the OBW can be considerably reduced.\n\nProposal 1: Apply a span of 1.5 CHBW for 400 MHz and use the same span for the other channel bandwidth in order to optimize the impact of noise. \nObservation 2: Occupied bandwidth is tested with CP-OFDM waveform which has a larger MPR than DTF-s-OFDM waveform.\nProposal 2: Select DFT-s-OFDM QPSK as waveform and modulation since it has the lowest MPR and allows to reduce the impact of noise on the OBW MU.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":89,"ainumber":"5.3.2.17","ainame":"\tDiscussion Papers \/ Work Plan \/ TC lists","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":24580,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-05-08 20:26:22","uploaded":"2020-05-09 08:59:07","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"5GS_NR_LTE-UEConTest"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_87_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-202458.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-ah-38102","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]