[{"name":"R5-202082","title":"Discussion on size of Quiet Zone above 30cm","source":"ROHDE & SCHWARZ","contact":"Edwin Menzel","contact-id":65839,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Endorsement","abstract":"Associated CRs in R5-202083, R5-202084, R5-202085\nFollowing the discussion in previous meetings regarding QZ sizes bigger than 30cm in diameter, we present here our views on the next steps.\nThis is a resubmission of draft shared before RAN5 #86-e meeting with additional data from a device survey.\nIn this contribution, the following observations and proposals were made:\nObservation 1: The attempt to cover all possible devices sizes with a discrete number of QZ sizes is not a sustainable approach.\nObservation 2: ~81% of the devices in the available dataset are covered with a 50cm QZ.\nProposal 1: Select 50cm as the QZ size to test devices larger than current QZ limited to 30cm.\nProposal 2: OEM and operators to provide data on NR FR2 devices size.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":89,"ainumber":"5.3.2.17","ainame":"\tDiscussion Papers \/ Work Plan \/ TC lists","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20820,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-05-07 17:23:42","uploaded":"2020-05-09 07:16:38","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"5GS_NR_LTE-UEConTest"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_87_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-202082.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-ah-38102","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]