[{"name":"R4-2014941","title":"PUSCH Demodulation performance requirements for operation in unlicensed bands","source":"Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell","contact":"Rafael Cauduro Dias de Paiva","contact-id":85281,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Approval","abstract":"Proposal 1: RAN4 to consider only 1 interlace allocation for PUSCH performance requirements.\n\nProposal 2: RAN4 to define wideband performance requirements for 20, 40, 60, and 80 MHz.\n\nProposal 3: Depending on vendor declaration, define that a BS is only required to perform tests for 20 MHz and the largest supported bandwidth.\n\nProposal 4: RAN4 to define BS demodulation requirements for CG-UCI multiplexed on PUSCH, if demodulation impact is identified.\n\nProposal 5: RAN4 to consider the following parameters as baseline the definition of PUSCH BS demodulation requirements","secretary_remarks":"[97e][316] NR_unlic_Demod_BS","agenda_item_sort_order":127,"ainumber":"7.1.8.4.1","ainame":"PUSCH requirements [NR_unlic-Perf]","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":8230,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-10-23 06:38:02","uploaded":"2020-10-23 17:06:26","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-16","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_unlic-Perf"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG4_Radio\/TSGR4_97_e\/Docs\/R4-2014941.zip","group":"R4","meeting":"R4-97-e","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R4-2015637","title":"Discussion on NR-U PUSCH performance requirements","source":"Huawei, HiSilicon","contact":"Tricia Li","contact-id":56874,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Discussion","abstract":"Proposal 1: Define the BS requirements only for scenario A. i.e. Carrier aggregation between licensed band NR and unlicensed band NR-U. \n\nProposal 2: Define the performance requirements per CC only for scenario A. For the performance requirement of PCell, reuse it from NR Rel-15. For the performance requirement of SCell, define the case with bandwidth of 20MHz, 40MHz, 60MHz and 80MHz.\n\nProposal 3: No need to define the BS requirement for wideband operation 1\n\nProposal 4: Set intra cell guard size to 0 for PUSCH requirements.\n\nProposal 5: Introduce the performance requirements for CG-UCI when it is multiplexing on PUSCH with interlaced resource allocation and no HARQ-ACK, CSI part 1, CSI part 2 are existed.\n\nProposal 6: Use Table 1 as simulation assumptions","secretary_remarks":"[97e][316] NR_unlic_Demod_BS","agenda_item_sort_order":127,"ainumber":"7.1.8.4.1","ainame":"PUSCH requirements [NR_unlic-Perf]","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":8240,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-10-23 11:56:13","uploaded":"2020-10-23 18:08:25","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_unlic-Perf"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG4_Radio\/TSGR4_97_e\/Docs\/R4-2015637.zip","group":"R4","meeting":"R4-97-e","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R4-2015852","title":"discussion on NR-U PUSCH demodulation assumptions","source":"Ericsson","contact":"Xiaolin Pu","contact-id":81116,"tdoctype":"other","for":"Discussion","abstract":"Discussion on NR-U PUSCH demodulation assumptions.\n\nProposal 1: Only consider 20MHz bandwidth for NR-U PUSCH requirement.\n\nProposal 2: Using single interlace with 10 PRBs for NR-U PUSCH demodulation simulation.\n\nProposal 3: Consider following assumptions for NR-U PUSCH demodulation simulation. \n\nProposal 4: Consider introduce a Rel-15 requirement for HARQ-ACK multiplexing on PUSCH with more than 2 HARQ-ACK information bits and using it to cover CG-UCI multiplexing on CG-PUSCH in NR-U scenario with proper applicability rule.","secretary_remarks":"[97e][316] NR_unlic_Demod_BS","agenda_item_sort_order":127,"ainumber":"7.1.8.4.1","ainame":"PUSCH requirements [NR_unlic-Perf]","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":8250,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-10-23 13:31:40","uploaded":"2020-10-23 15:42:04","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-16","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_unlic-Perf"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG4_Radio\/TSGR4_97_e\/Docs\/R4-2015852.zip","group":"R4","meeting":"R4-97-e","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R4-2015988","title":"Discussion on NR-U PUSCH requirements","source":"Intel Corporation","contact":"Andrey Chervyakov","contact-id":47232,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Discussion","abstract":"Proposal 1: RAN4 to define demodulation requirements for PRB-Interlaced PUSCH Resource Allocation considering single interlace.\n\nProposal 2: Do not define requirements for UCI multiplexed on PUSCH","secretary_remarks":"[97e][316] NR_unlic_Demod_BS","agenda_item_sort_order":127,"ainumber":"7.1.8.4.1","ainame":"PUSCH requirements [NR_unlic-Perf]","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":8260,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-10-23 14:27:49","uploaded":"2020-10-23 23:26:39","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-16","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_unlic-Perf"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG4_Radio\/TSGR4_97_e\/Docs\/R4-2015988.zip","group":"R4","meeting":"R4-97-e","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]