[{"name":"R5-240643","title":"NG.114 test coverage","source":"Ericsson","contact":"Bo J\u00f6nsson","contact-id":76116,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Endorsement","abstract":"For NG.114 [1] we\u2019ve agreed to provide test coverage using the default EVS Configuration A2. We\u2019ve have also conluded that additional testing for any other non default EVS configuration is currently not desired.\nFor preconditions we\u2019ve have, in addition to the default with the precondition mechanism enabled, also agreed to provide additional test coverage for the non default configuration when the use of preconditions is disabled. In test cases e.g. expressed as \u201d The UE is configured to not use preconditions.\u201d.\nUntil now, we\u2019ve not discussed any test coverage for any other non default configurations in detail. However, a discussion on the Reliable 18x policy has just started. \nIn addition we\u2019ve also allowed an exemption for the NG.114 [1] video feature, adopted a compromise on test coverage for e.g. test case 7.1 and there\u2019s a discussion on IMS for RedCap.\nIt would be helpful if we can agree on some principles for NG.114 [1] test coverage. \n2\tDiscussion\nAn essential part of the RAN5 outcome is the test coverage, and expectations, for different UEs. Specifically for IMS and NG.114 [1] some agreement and clarifications may help. \nIt would be reasonable e.g., if the test coverage for the mandatory default configuration is fulfilled for every UE. Any additional test coverage should be consistent for every UE.\nBelow is a proposal for one principle as a guideline.\nNG.114 principle 2-1: \nThe test coverage shall be consistent and aligned for all UEs independent of specific configurations. \n3\tProposal\nIt\u2019s proposed to apply the NG.114 principle 2-1.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":967,"ainumber":"6.6.6.6","ainame":"Discussion Papers \/ Work Plan \/ TC lists","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":6430,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2024-02-14 12:56:39","uploaded":"2024-02-16 17:26:24","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":"","crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ran\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5__102_Athens\/Docs\/R5-240643.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-102","year":2024,"uicc_affected":"","me_affected":"","ran_affected":"","cn_affected":"","clauses_affected":"","crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R5-241310","title":"5G IMS voice test coverage","source":"Ericsson","contact":"Bo J\u00f6nsson","contact-id":76116,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Endorsement","abstract":"For 5G IMS, the 5GS (NR\/5GC) and NG.114 has mainly been addressed for IMS voice. But, for 5G and EN-DC the IR.92 applies for IMS voice.\nThe same requirements e.g. for voice and the EVS default configuration applies for IR.92 [1] and NG.114. \n2\tDiscussion\nThe EVS default configuration is applied for each NG.114 IMS test case.\nAll 5G IMS test cases, including IR.92, could also be aligned for the EVS default configuration.\nProposal 2-1:\nIt\u2019s proposed to clarify the only required and used EVS default configuration for each 5G IMS test case. \n3\tProposal\nIt\u2019s proposed to implement the proposal 2-1.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":967,"ainumber":"6.6.6.6","ainame":"Discussion Papers \/ Work Plan \/ TC lists","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":13100,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2024-02-16 17:18:17","uploaded":"2024-02-16 17:30:24","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":"","crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ran\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5__102_Athens\/Docs\/R5-241310.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-102","year":2024,"uicc_affected":"","me_affected":"","ran_affected":"","cn_affected":"","clauses_affected":"","crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]