[{"name":"R5-205137","title":"On the content of the TS 38.523-1 and TS 38.523-1 pre\/after meeting status documents","source":"Samsung (Rapporteur)","contact":"Stoyan Baev","contact-id":2367,"tdoctype":"discussion","for":"Approval","abstract":"In summary, RAN5 is invited to approve the following proposals:\nProposal #1\nIt is proposed that RAN5 agrees that approaches applied in regard to the content of the TS 38.523-1 and TS 36.523-1 tracking documents are aligned. That is:\n1\tTest cases belonging to (introduced by) all WIs, regardless from their release should be tracked (included in the document)\n2\tThe Process for allocating clause numbers for new test cases and the Process for maintaining the TC information in the TS tracker document are applied to both.\nProposal #2 (alternatives)\na\tIt is proposed that RAN5 agrees that the tracking document should include all test cases which have been assigned a sub-clause number including those that are maintained by a not closed WI. To avoid the possibility for information misalignment until the WI is closed, the exact status and details of such tests should not be maintained by the tracker document, the status until the WI is closed should be set to 'Assigned', and, an explicit note referring to the WP where they are maintained should be provided.\nOR alternatively\nb\tIt is proposed that RAN5 agrees that the tracking document should include all test cases which have been assigned a sub-clause number including those that are maintained by a not closed WI with all the details as per the latest version of the WP of the WI.\nProposal #3\nIt is proposed that RAN5 agrees that when a test case in one of the test specs is made Void, this should be reflected in the tracker documents in similar way this is done in the test specification i.e. preserving the test case section number and replacing the title with the word \"Void\". In addition, any additional information about the test case being made void should be removed from the tracker, and, an explicit reference to the RAN5 Tdoc which voided the TC should be provided; wherever suitable very brief indication for the reasons for the removal can also be provided.\nProposal #4\nIt is proposed that RAN5 agrees that all RAN5 WP which include Signalling test cases shall be written in excel format using the template utilised for the 5G\/NR Rel-15 original WI. If it is found useful a possibly simplified template could be specified for the purposes of TS 36.523-1's (and other RAN5 test Specifications containing Signalling test cases) WPs to use it.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":395,"ainumber":"6.2","ainame":"Review incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":51370,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2020-10-21 14:03:26","uploaded":"2020-10-29 10:36:08","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":"","crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_89_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-205137.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-89-e","year":2020,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]