[{"name":"R5-222065","title":"Reply LS on ambiguity in deciding TL,C","source":"TSG WG RAN4","contact":"Ingbert Sigovich","contact-id":28887,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"RAN4 thanks RAN5 LS on ambiguity in deciding TL,C. RAN4 has discussed understandings and achieved the following agreement:\n\tThe understanding 1 \u201cThe source of ?TC,c is the same as NOTE 3 in table 6.2.1-1, therefore the 1.5dB relaxation shouldn\u2019t be considered again when deciding TL,C\u201d is correct. \nTherefore, the numeric example of understanding 1 should be used for the UE conformance testing.\nActions: To TSG RAN WG5: RAN4 asks RAN5 to take into account the above clarification in the future.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":39,"ainumber":"5.2","ainame":"\tReview incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20650,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2022-03-21 17:24:52","uploaded":"2022-04-14 18:22:54","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_newRAT-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"R5-206676","lsto":"TSG WG RAN5","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"R4-2205270","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_95_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-222065.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-95-e","year":2022,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R5-222066","title":"Response LS to RAN5 on LTE REFSENS Exceptions Simplification","source":"TSG WG RAN4","contact":"Ingbert Sigovich","contact-id":28887,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"RAN4 thanks RAN5 the replied LS on LTE REFSENS Exceptions Simplification. RAN4 has discussed the option 2a proposed by RAN5 and agreed to adopt it as below.\nOption 2a: \n-\tFor new Rel-17 band combinations:\n-\tFor TPs for TR: According to the agreed WF, do not specify higher order REFSENS test points if already covered by a fall-back combination,\n-\tFor 36.101: Remove REFSENS test points if already covered by fall-back combination via small CR.\n-\tFor legacy combinations:\n-\tKeep only the lowest order fall-back test points and remove all redundant REFSENS test points in TS 36.101 Rel-17,\n-\tFor 36.101: Clarify that simplified REFSENS requirements in Rel-17 specifications could be release independently supported by earlier UEs. This could be clarified as a NOTE in TS 36.101,\n-\tDo not bring any change to earlier Releases of TS 36.101.\nNote that the core requirements for the high order CA combinations are unchanged after simplification. The official CR for LTE REFSENS simplification is attached.\t\nActions: To TSG RAN WG5: \tRAN4 asks RAN5 to take this agreement into account in the future.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":39,"ainumber":"5.2","ainame":"\tReview incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20660,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2022-03-21 17:24:52","uploaded":"2022-04-14 18:22:54","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-17","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"LTE_CA_R17_2BDL_1BUL"},{"winame":" LTE_CA_R17_3BDL_1BUL"},{"winame":" LTE_CA_R17_xBDL_1BUL"},{"winame":" LTE_CA_R17_2BDL_2BUL"},{"winame":" LTE_CA_R17_xBDL_2BUL"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"R5-215803","lsto":"TSG WG RAN5","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"R4-2205271","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_95_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-222066.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-95-e","year":2022,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R5-222067","title":"Further Reply LS on requirement in Power Class 2 for UL MIMO","source":"TSG WG RAN4","contact":"Ingbert Sigovich","contact-id":28887,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"RAN4 thanks GCF CAG for the LS on power class ambiguities in RAN4 specification. Previously, the conclusion for Rel-16 has been sent back via LS RAN4#96-e (R4-2011903), and the related revision has been applied in Rel-16. Now, RAN4 would like to inform GCF CAG about the conclusions for Rel-15:\nFor the general description of EN-DC power class in Rel-15 TS 38.101-3 sub-clause 6.1, RAN4 has been decided to keep it as it is.\nFor the fall back description for section 6.2D.1 of 3GPP 38.101-1, further revision was agreed in CR R4-2118286 and aligned with Rel-16 which is already implemented in TS 38.101-1 V15.16.0.\nWith this, RAN4 consider this issue closed for Rel-15 and no more discussion is expected. The detailed study process will be added into TR 38.837 V0.4.0.\nAction: To GCF CAG: RAN4 asks GCF CAG to take the above information into account.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":39,"ainumber":"5.2","ainame":"\tReview incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20670,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2022-03-21 17:24:52","uploaded":"2022-04-14 18:22:54","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_newRAT-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"R4-2006116 \/ CAG-20-193r3","lsto":"GCF CAG","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"R4-2206296","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_95_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-222067.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-95-e","year":2022,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R5-222068","title":"LS on time mask for TDM NR Uu-SL intra-band concurrent switching","source":"TSG WG RAN4","contact":"Ingbert Sigovich","contact-id":28887,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"RAN4 has reached consensus on the time mask requirement as shown below:\nThe switching time shall be located on the link with lower priority when NR Uu and NR SL have different priorities based on priority information specified in TS 38.321. It is up to UE implementation when NR Uu and NR SL have the same priority based on priority information specified in TS 38.321.\nThe above time mask requirement is to give criteria on how the switching period position is decided based on priority information. RAN4 made an agreement that no RF test is needed for this NR Uu to NR SL switching time mask requirement defined in TS 38.101-1 Clause 6.3E.3.4. \nAction: To RAN5: RAN4 asks RAN5 to take the above information into account.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":39,"ainumber":"5.2","ainame":"\tReview incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20680,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2022-03-21 17:24:52","uploaded":"2022-04-14 18:22:54","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-17","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"5G_V2X_NRSL-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"TSG WG RAN5","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"R4-2206526","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_95_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-222068.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-95-e","year":2022,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R5-222069","title":"Reply LS on configuration of p-MaxEUTRA and p-NR-FR1","source":"TSG WG RAN4","contact":"Ingbert Sigovich","contact-id":28887,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"RAN4 thanks RAN5 LS on configuration of p-MaxEUTRA and p-NR-FR1. RAN4 has discussed it and made the following response.\nFor UEs supporting dynamic power sharing, RAN4 understanding is there is no specified UE behavior when the network does not configure p-MaxEUTRA or p-NR-FR1. It is up to RAN1 to confirm if this is a valid configuration. RAN4 will further discuss whether \u2018infinity\u2019 could be used as default value if these two parameters are not configured, and whether and how to capture this in the specification.\nFor UEs not supporting dynamic power sharing, RAN4 understanding is the UE\u2019s transmitted power is not fully specified by RAN4. It is up to RAN1 to decide if p-MaxEUTRA or p-NR-FR1 should be configured by the network or if default values are needed.\nActions to TSG RAN WG5: RAN4 asks RAN5 to take into account the above information in the conformance testing work.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":39,"ainumber":"5.2","ainame":"\tReview incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20690,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2022-03-21 17:24:52","uploaded":"2022-04-14 18:22:54","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_newRAT-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"R5-217995","lsto":"TSG WG RAN5","Cc":"TSG WG RAN1, TSG WG RAN2","lsoriginalls":"R4-2206567","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_95_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-222069.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-95-e","year":2022,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"R5-222070","title":"Reply LS on configuration of p-MaxEUTRA and p-NR-FR1","source":"TSG WG RAN1","contact":"Ingbert Sigovich","contact-id":28887,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"RAN1 thanks RAN5 for the LS on configuration of p-MaxEUTRA and p-NR-FR1. RAN1 answers are as follows.\nQ1: Whether the RAN1 specifications require that the IEs p-MaxEUTRA and p-NR-FR1 are always configured by the network when UE works in EN-DC connectivity mode.\nAnswer: there is no specified UE behavior in existing RAN1 specifications for the case where FR1-FR1 EN-DC is configured but p-MaxEUTRA or p-NR-FR1 is not configured. RAN1 may discuss potential action, if any, after RAN2\/4 responses are received.\nActions: To: RAN5 RAN1 asks RAN5 to take the above answer into account in their future work.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":39,"ainumber":"5.2","ainame":"\tReview incoming LS (fm A.I. 3) & new subject discussion papers","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":20700,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2022-03-21 17:24:52","uploaded":"2022-04-14 18:22:54","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_newRAT-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"R1-2200873\/R5-217995","lsto":"TSG WG RAN5","Cc":"TSG WG RAN2, TSG WG RAN4","lsoriginalls":"R1-2202769","lsreply":"","link":"https:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/TSG_RAN\/WG5_Test_ex-T1\/TSGR5_95_Electronic\/Docs\/R5-222070.zip","group":"R5","meeting":"R5-95-e","year":2022,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]