[{"name":"C4-176156","title":"Reply LS on Early Data Transmission","source":"CT1","contact":"Amer Catovic","contact-id":39766,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"3GPP TSG CT WG1 asks SA2 group to consider clarifying in their specs that the MMEC pools of the PLMNs sharing the network should not overlap.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":7,"ainumber":"4","ainame":"Input liaison statements: allocation to agenda items as appropriate","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":0,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2017-11-15 12:53:31","uploaded":"2017-11-15 13:15:20","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"LTE_eMTC4-Core"},{"winame":"NB_IOTenh2-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"C1-174263\/R2-1711978","lsto":"RAN2, SA2","Cc":"RAN3, SA3, CT4","lsoriginalls":"C1-174595","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ct\/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4\/TSGCT4_81_Reno\/Docs\/C4-176156.zip","group":"C4","meeting":"C4-81","year":2017,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"C4-176158","title":"Reply LS on the number of bearers","source":"CT1","contact":"Lalith Kumar","contact-id":60520,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Information","abstract":"3GPP TSG CT WG1 kindly asks SA2 to consider the information provided in this LS.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":7,"ainumber":"4","ainame":"Input liaison statements: allocation to agenda items as appropriate","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":0,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2017-11-15 12:59:12","uploaded":"2017-11-15 13:15:20","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"TEI15"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"SA WG2, RAN WG2","Cc":"CT WG4, RAN, CT, SA, SA WG1","lsoriginalls":"C1-174658","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ct\/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4\/TSGCT4_81_Reno\/Docs\/C4-176158.zip","group":"C4","meeting":"C4-81","year":2017,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"C4-176377","title":"LS reply on support of Trace and MDT in NG-RAN in rel-15","source":"SA5","contact":"Anatoly Andrianov","contact-id":68259,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Discussion","abstract":"","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":7,"ainumber":"4","ainame":"Input liaison statements: allocation to agenda items as appropriate","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":0,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2017-12-01 01:06:08","uploaded":"2017-12-01 15:24:41","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"NR_newRAT-Core"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"S5-176048 \/ R3-173422","lsto":"RAN3, CT4","Cc":"RAN2","lsoriginalls":"S5-176477","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ct\/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4\/TSGCT4_81_Reno\/Docs\/C4-176377.zip","group":"C4","meeting":"C4-81","year":2017,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"C4-176384","title":"LS on extension of S6x interface for BEST","source":"SA3","contact":"Peter A. Wild","contact-id":15130,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Discussion","abstract":"As release 15 is closing, SA3 would like to confirm that CT4 is happy that the S6a interface is used and that CT4 do not want to adopt the EMSDP protocol.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":7,"ainumber":"4","ainame":"Input liaison statements: allocation to agenda items as appropriate","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":0,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2017-12-01 02:28:24","uploaded":"2017-12-01 15:24:41","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"BEST_MTC_Sec"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"","lsto":"CT4","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"S3-173461","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ct\/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4\/TSGCT4_81_Reno\/Docs\/C4-176384.zip","group":"C4","meeting":"C4-81","year":2017,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"C4-176388","title":"Reply LS on extension of S6x interface for BEST","source":"CT4","contact":"Peter A. Wild","contact-id":15130,"tdoctype":"LS out","for":"Approval","abstract":"","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":7,"ainumber":"4","ainame":"Input liaison statements: allocation to agenda items as appropriate","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":0,"status":"approved","reservation_date":"2017-12-01 02:46:17","uploaded":"2017-12-02 00:08:39","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":[{"winame":"BEST_MTC_Sec"}],"crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"S3-173461","lsto":"SA3","Cc":"","lsoriginalls":"","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ct\/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4\/TSGCT4_81_Reno\/Docs\/C4-176388.zip","group":"C4","meeting":"C4-81","year":2017,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0},
{"name":"C4-176391","title":"Reply LS on the number of bearers","source":"Samsung","contact":"Andy Bennett","contact-id":70253,"tdoctype":"LS in","for":"Discussion","abstract":"SA2 has identified two potential alternative options for progressing the work. \nOption 1 would be to increase the number of EPS bearers to 11. In this case there would be no NAS impact and no work necessary in SA2. \nOption 2 would be to increase the number of EPS bearers to 15 or to align with number of bearers in NR subject to RAN2 decision. In this case there would be NAS impacts and work in SA2.\n\nSA2\u2019s preference is for a single option, i.e. Option 2. SA2 would also like to recommend completion within Release 15, subject to TSG approval.","secretary_remarks":"","agenda_item_sort_order":7,"ainumber":"4","ainame":"Input liaison statements: allocation to agenda items as appropriate","tdoc_agenda_sort_order":0,"status":"noted","reservation_date":"2017-12-01 15:35:56","uploaded":"2017-12-02 00:08:39","revisionof":"","revisedto":"","release":"Rel-15","crspec":"","crspecversion":"","workitem":"","crnumber":"","crrevision":"","crcategory":"","tsg_crp":"","lsreplyto":"R2-1712066, C1-174658, C4-175345","lsto":"RAN2, CT1, CT4, RAN, SA, CT","Cc":"SA1","lsoriginalls":"S2-179536","lsreply":"","link":"http:\/\/www.3gpp.org\/ftp\/tsg_ct\/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4\/TSGCT4_81_Reno\/Docs\/C4-176391.zip","group":"C4","meeting":"C4-81","year":2017,"uicc_affected":null,"me_affected":null,"ran_affected":null,"cn_affected":null,"clauses_affected":null,"crsinpack":null,"crsinpacknumber":0}]